Read more about the article ๐—ž๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ฎ ๐—›๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ต ๐—–๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜ ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ถ๐˜๐˜€ ๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐Ÿฐ๐Ÿต๐Ÿด๐—” ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ฐ๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ด๐—ผ ๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐˜€๐˜๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜€

๐—ž๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ฎ ๐—›๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ต ๐—–๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜ ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ถ๐˜๐˜€ ๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐Ÿฐ๐Ÿต๐Ÿด๐—” ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ฐ๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ด๐—ผ ๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐˜€๐˜๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜€

  • Post comments:0 Comments

The Kerala High Court on Thursday i.e. 12th October, allowed a man accused of committing the offence punishable under IPC Section 498A (cruelty to woman by husband or his relatives)…

Continue Reading๐—ž๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ฎ ๐—›๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ต ๐—–๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜ ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ถ๐˜๐˜€ ๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐Ÿฐ๐Ÿต๐Ÿด๐—” ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ฐ๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ด๐—ผ ๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐˜€๐˜๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜€
Read more about the article Husband Not Liable for Rape Under IPC, Anything Beyond Natural Intercourse Cannot Be Labelled as โ€˜Unnatural Sexโ€™, Says Madhya Pradesh High Court

Husband Not Liable for Rape Under IPC, Anything Beyond Natural Intercourse Cannot Be Labelled as โ€˜Unnatural Sexโ€™, Says Madhya Pradesh High Court

  • Post comments:0 Comments

The Madhya Pradesh High Court has found that because Indian law currently does not recognise marital rape, a husband cannot be held accountable under Section 377 of the Indian Penal…

Continue ReadingHusband Not Liable for Rape Under IPC, Anything Beyond Natural Intercourse Cannot Be Labelled as โ€˜Unnatural Sexโ€™, Says Madhya Pradesh High Court
Read more about the article ๐——๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ต๐—ถ ๐—›๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ต ๐—–๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜ ๐˜€๐—ฎ๐˜†๐˜€ ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ถ๐—ป๐˜€๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—ถ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜๐˜† ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐˜€๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ป๐˜ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ฐ๐—ฟ๐˜‚๐—ฒ๐—น๐˜๐˜†, ๐—ด๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜๐˜€ ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐˜„๐—ถ๐—ณ๐—ฒ

๐——๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ต๐—ถ ๐—›๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ต ๐—–๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜ ๐˜€๐—ฎ๐˜†๐˜€ ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ถ๐—ป๐˜€๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—ถ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜๐˜† ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐˜€๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ป๐˜ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ฐ๐—ฟ๐˜‚๐—ฒ๐—น๐˜๐˜†, ๐—ด๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜๐˜€ ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐˜„๐—ถ๐—ณ๐—ฒ

  • Post comments:0 Comments

A division bench of Justices Suresh Kumar Kait and Neena Bansal Krishna said that financial instability on account of a husband not being settled in any business or profession, which…

Continue Reading๐——๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ต๐—ถ ๐—›๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ต ๐—–๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜ ๐˜€๐—ฎ๐˜†๐˜€ ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ถ๐—ป๐˜€๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—ถ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜๐˜† ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐˜€๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ป๐˜ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ฐ๐—ฟ๐˜‚๐—ฒ๐—น๐˜๐˜†, ๐—ด๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜๐˜€ ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐˜„๐—ถ๐—ณ๐—ฒ