You are currently viewing ๐——๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฐ ๐—ฑ๐˜‚๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐˜€๐—ต๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ฑ ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ฒ๐—พ๐˜‚๐—ถ๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—น๐˜† ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐˜๐˜„๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐˜„๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป: ๐—๐˜‚๐˜€๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ ๐—ฆ ๐—ฅ๐—ฎ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ ๐—•๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜

๐——๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฐ ๐—ฑ๐˜‚๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐˜€๐—ต๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ฑ ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ฒ๐—พ๐˜‚๐—ถ๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—น๐˜† ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐˜๐˜„๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐˜„๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป: ๐—๐˜‚๐˜€๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ ๐—ฆ ๐—ฅ๐—ฎ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ ๐—•๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜

Supreme Court judge Justice S Ravindra Bhat on Saturday said the lack of representation of women in judiciary is a concern.

Elaborating on this point, Justice Bhat explained that even though Madras High Court has the highest number of women judges, yet that number is nowhere close to the desired strength.

โ€œWhen it comes to the judiciary, gender representation has historically been a concern. Tamil Nadu with highest number of female judges, but nowhere close to where it needs to be. The glass ceiling is very real and palpable for women,โ€ he said.

Justice Bhat highlighted how domestic work was a reason holding back women from taking on more responsible positions in professions.

“Domestic expectations that burden women disproportionately cannot be seen as inevitable and instead the effort must be to progress towards a society that recognises and prioritises a more equal division of such labour,” the judge said.

The Supreme Court judge was speaking at a conference on Women in Power & Decision Making organised by the PHD Chamber of Commerce and Industry (PHDCCI).

“I am acutely aware of what some may perceive as ironic that being a man I have been invited to speak at this inaugural session.. its a thought I have wrestled too with and I think it calls for genuine engagement,” he said.

While pointing out that career challenges for women were diverse, Justice Bhat said that these issues being institutional should be handled by organisations at an institutional level.

While considering mandatory representation, the judge pointed out that while India has tried to lay down representation through legislature, efforts are required to ensure it doesnโ€™t remain a token representation.

“Often representation devolves into a merely tokenistic gesture where women are given ornamental positions where the decisions are being made by someone else. This does more harm than good, given that women are occupying positions of power without any of its consequential benefits flowing to other women in the ecosystem,โ€œ the judge highlighted.

He observed that there seemed to be a rise in the number of women in litigation and the endeavour now should be to provide a productive work environment for them to ensure that they do not feel the need to step away from their career.

“It begins with basic steps. It requires leaders and stakeholders to be alive to the unique issues faced by them and quickly work on their resolution in order to retain their participation,โ€ the judge suggested.

Leave a Reply